Sunday, February 28, 2010
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Oki Dog #2
Friday, February 26, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Winter Fog #1
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Boats—Monterey Bay
Always of interest is the fact that the best shot of the trip very often is unplanned. (Mike has called this phenomenon "the Zen of Photography.")
Mike had taken photos in Point Lobos the prior afternoon and gotten up early the next morning to check out Pacific Grove and Asilomar Beach. He was nearing Cannery Row when he saw these boats out of the corner of his eye. He quickly pulled over, got out and rejoiced to find that the parking meters hadn't started working yet. He grabbed his camera and headed down to the harbor: this is his pick out of several photos taken.
[Note: it's interesting to realize that located in the hills surrounding the Monterey Bay in the background is the Cal State Monterey Bay campus. But earlier . . . much earlier . . . it was the site of Fort Ord, where Mike had a pleasant time attending U.S. Army basic training in 1964. He remembers standing at the barracks window, staring out at the harbor . . . ]
Photo: Boats (Sunrise)—Monterey, 2010
Labels:
Coast,
Monterey Bay,
Monterey County,
Photography
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Olympus E-620: Final Thoughts
For some reason the E-620 (unlike earlier Olympus models: the E-510, or the wonderful C-8080) never worked for me. It wasn’t as obvious a situation as with the Sony R1 . . . no, but in the end it took about the same time (several months) for me to decide that I wasn’t that thrilled with it.
The technical issues were:
Physical: a) The handgrip is very small and not very usable (even for me, with small hands). Just a little bit uncomfortable when used with the largish 12-60mm lens. Not a major problem, of course. But still . . . b) I almost never used the rotating LCD screen due to the angle at which it rotates. Too bad! I would like to see a usable tilting screen some day.
Exposure issues: Olympus has evidently rewritten the software in their cameras. In order to avoid overexposing the highlights, their cameras significantly underexposure all scenes (at ISO 200 and higher). Some say: no big deal. My take: of course, this creates shadow areas that are much too dark, so the software goes ahead and boosts exposure in those areas, thus creating, alas, obtrusive shadow noise. For me, this is a little too clever: if you want to give me this feature, make it something that I can turn on and off. But it’s built-in and can’t be turned off: in order to compensate you have to use a higher ISO and overexpose. No thanks.
Non-technical:
The bottom line is that I took a lot of photographs with the camera, but for some reason I never got images that I really liked. This almost goes into the realm of the mystical, because it’s really impossible to pinpoint why certain cameras work and others don’t.
I was happy enough with my old Olympus E-510, but its mode dial didn’t work even after paying for repairs. Olympus has no obvious upgrade path that would address the exposure issue, since one would necessarily assume that the next model up, the E-30, would have the same (exposure) functionality.
This Christmas I had a bit of a financial windfall! So, as I’ve noted, I’ve now been extensively utilizing the Nikon D90. A report on this will be forthcoming.
Photo: Olympus Gear to Ship—Marin County, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Monday Pelican Blogging
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Friday, February 19, 2010
Disney Hall
References:
Wikipedia article. (With links to the Wikipedia Frank Gehry article.)
Self-Portraits. (Very interesting . . . the photographer, Ann Althouse, also has a right-wingy political blog.)
Photos: Disney Hall (vertical)—Los Angeles, 2010; Self-Portrait (Disney Hall)—Los Angeles, 2010
Thursday, February 18, 2010
. . . from the archives #57: Digger Pine Cone—Lake County, 1993
Photo: Digger Pine Cone—Lake County, 1993
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Ansel Adams Mantel
"In a contrarian touch, the long, west-facing wall with its potentially great view of the ocean held but one window and a huge stone fireplace with a twenty-four-foot-long mantel. At the mantel's center presided Ansel's mammoth Chinese temple drum, nearly six feet in diameter, long since acquired from William Colby."
Mary Alinder, Ansel Adams: A Biography
Photo: Adams Mantel—Carmel, 1984
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Morley Baer
A recent post by Howard Grill on Morley Baer reminded of the time in 1984 when I was taking a Friends of Photography seminar in Monterey. Part of the activities included a visit to Mr. Baer at his house in Carmel Valley. I seem to recall that he gave us some generic inspirational advice ("only take photographs of things you believe in" or somesuch).
Photo: Morley Baer—Carmel, 1984
Monday, February 15, 2010
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Santa Barbara Mission #1
Earlier this month Mike found himself driving north out of Los Angeles on highway 101. As he passed through Santa Barbara he decided, on the spur of the moment, to visit the Santa Barbara Mission.
The outside facade was being lit by the early morning sun . . . very contrasty. But in the interior courtyards the light was much more subdued.
Photos: St. Francis—Santa Barbara, 2010; Agave & Adobe Wall—Santa Barbara, 2010
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Friday, February 12, 2010
It's Time For A Drink
Yes, not only is it Friday but it's also Abraham Lincoln's birthday.
Scenes from a breakfast visit last month with Pat and Joe to L.A.'s Farmer's Market. That early, the bar wasn't yet open, alas, just starting to stir as we were leaving.
Photos: It's Time For A Drink—Los Angeles, 2010; Bar (Farmers Market)—Los Angeles, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Blu Ray: Big Problems
Recently I purchased a Sony Blu Ray player from Costco—with an instant rebate it came to just over $100.00. After using it for a number of weeks I’ve reluctantly decided that the hassles of Blu Ray outweigh the benefits and I’ll be returning the machine and canceling the Blu Ray option in Netflix.
I’ve noticed that in researching Blu Ray on the internet the main disadvantages cited for the format have to do with price (players and discs) and the need for a high-definition television. Alas, there are other serious disadvantages to the format: the problems in my case seem to reside in both the player and the discs themselves.
Issues:
—Actually this is the second player I got from Costco. The first one was subject to gray horizontal scrolling lines. Since the second one had the same interference pattern I reasoned that it wasn’t the player so I did some research. It seems that the Comcast cable coming into the television was creating the problem: it was interfering with the HDMI cable. Once disconnected the lines vanished. Of course, disconnecting the cable input is not going to work for most people. Don’t know if this is an issue with other players.
—Basic operations are incredibly slow and kludgy. Just ejecting a disc is somehow much longer than on a standard DVD. Trying to get to the feature, especially on Disney Blu Rays, is just outrageous in the delay involved. First there’s an unskippable Blu Ray promo. Then a number of previews. Then, the movie. No, the download of the movie. Finally, the movie.
—Yes, the movie has no resume function. It doesn’t have a resume function! That is, you can’t stop it, turn off the player, then later resume watching at your previous stopping point. This truly is fatal. [Update: David Pogue, the New York Times Technology columnist, says that ". . . ALL Blu-Ray players do that infuriating thing you describe: lose your place if you hit Stop. An appalling step backwards!"]
—The menus combined with the remote are quite opaque. I’ve accidentally totally stopped the movie while trying to navigate with the remote. Then, see "trying to get to the feature" above.
—Finally, the picture is better, yes. But not by a fantastic margin as was the case when going from VHS to DVD. It’s just . . . better. Certainly not perfect . . . my player had issues with certain panning sequences in the movies, particularly of strong horizontal motifs (steps).
I’m actually wondering if some of these issues couldn’t be resolved right now, except for the companies’ need to have improved models in the future. As it is, the total Blu Ray experience, the player combined with the discs, is far worse than watching DVDs using a standard DVD player. How annoying!
For another take on a Disney Blu Ray disc (with much more colorful language), see here.
I’ve noticed that in researching Blu Ray on the internet the main disadvantages cited for the format have to do with price (players and discs) and the need for a high-definition television. Alas, there are other serious disadvantages to the format: the problems in my case seem to reside in both the player and the discs themselves.
Issues:
—Actually this is the second player I got from Costco. The first one was subject to gray horizontal scrolling lines. Since the second one had the same interference pattern I reasoned that it wasn’t the player so I did some research. It seems that the Comcast cable coming into the television was creating the problem: it was interfering with the HDMI cable. Once disconnected the lines vanished. Of course, disconnecting the cable input is not going to work for most people. Don’t know if this is an issue with other players.
—Basic operations are incredibly slow and kludgy. Just ejecting a disc is somehow much longer than on a standard DVD. Trying to get to the feature, especially on Disney Blu Rays, is just outrageous in the delay involved. First there’s an unskippable Blu Ray promo. Then a number of previews. Then, the movie. No, the download of the movie. Finally, the movie.
—Yes, the movie has no resume function. It doesn’t have a resume function! That is, you can’t stop it, turn off the player, then later resume watching at your previous stopping point. This truly is fatal. [Update: David Pogue, the New York Times Technology columnist, says that ". . . ALL Blu-Ray players do that infuriating thing you describe: lose your place if you hit Stop. An appalling step backwards!"]
—The menus combined with the remote are quite opaque. I’ve accidentally totally stopped the movie while trying to navigate with the remote. Then, see "trying to get to the feature" above.
—Finally, the picture is better, yes. But not by a fantastic margin as was the case when going from VHS to DVD. It’s just . . . better. Certainly not perfect . . . my player had issues with certain panning sequences in the movies, particularly of strong horizontal motifs (steps).
I’m actually wondering if some of these issues couldn’t be resolved right now, except for the companies’ need to have improved models in the future. As it is, the total Blu Ray experience, the player combined with the discs, is far worse than watching DVDs using a standard DVD player. How annoying!
For another take on a Disney Blu Ray disc (with much more colorful language), see here.
Point Lobos
Mike spent a recent afternoon at Point Lobos. There were high scattered clouds, which together with the winter sun being rather low in the west resulted in an extreme contrast situation. Which in turn meant a lot of fussing in Photoshop trying to get acceptable results. (The black and white photo is the result of "developing" the RAW image twice—once for highlights and once for shadows—and then combining them.)
(Blog note: this afternoon . . . Mike's take on Blu Ray!)
Photos: Afternoon—Point Lobos, 2010; Rocks & Sky—Point Lobos, 2010
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
MOCA
During his most recent trip to L.A. Mike visited the Museum of Contemporary Art, located on Grand Avenue. The featured exhibit was a 30-year retrospective of the museum's collection.
As Mike wandered through the exhibit halls he was slightly disappointed to find that there were no photorealist painters represented, although there were a few representative specimens of Pop Art. Perhaps photorealism doesn't fit into the museum's aesthetic.
There were also a number of photographers in the show, most notably and successfully images from Robert Frank's The Americans. Mike was slightly disappointed to find that there were no West Coast photographers represented (with the sole exception of Lewis Baltz, a number of whose photos were jammed together against one wall with no space between the frames, top or bottom . . . quite impossible to view.) No Edward Westons, Max Yavnos or Minor Whites. Perhaps these kinds of photographs don't fit into the museum's aesthetic.
In honor of the nature of the show, Mike took a blurred self-portrait photo in the vicinity, then messed with it in Photoshop to give it that contemporary look.
Photos: Ticket Office (MOCA)—Los Angeles, 2010; Self-Portrait (Downtown)—Los Angeles, 2010
Labels:
Art,
Los Angeles,
Photography,
Photorealist,
Self Portraits,
Urban Landscape
Monday, February 8, 2010
Monday Pigeon Blogging
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Pismo Beach Pier
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Melrose Avenue #13
Friday, February 5, 2010
Yard Sale
I took this as I was walking in a Hollywood neighborhood. I liked the clouds, the palm tree, and the fact that I could work in a self-portrait. But to then go on and take dozens of photos of other yard sales? Yawn . . . I don't think so.
But the prevailing doctrine is that the photographer needs to be engaged in projects such as that, because . . . well, I don't know exactly why.
Some references:
Projects.
Projects (see #6.)
Yard Sales.
Photo: Yard Sale—Los Angeles, 2008
Labels:
Los Angeles,
Photography,
Self Portraits,
Trees,
Urban Landscape
Thursday, February 4, 2010
. . . from the archives #56: Cemetery—Pacific Grove, 1987
I think that I was in the Monterey area to attend a photo workshop led by Rod Dresser, but I might have my dates wrong. I know that this was my second attempt at photographing the cemetery. (The first attempt was with a twin-lens reflex.)
Photo: Cemetery—Pacific Grove, 1987
Labels:
1980s,
BW,
from the archives,
Monterey County,
Photography
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Flower Store
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
Monday Crow Blogging
On the road back from the bristlecone pines; taken during last October's drive up highway 395.
Photo: Crow & Sierra Crest—White Mountains, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)